A Guide to Wall Shear Stress Measurement - #5 - Piezoelectric Transduction

Posted by Jared Anderson on Apr 6, 2020 2:17:45 PM

Moving forward with the four main direct transduction methods commonly employed with floating element shear stress sensors (piezoresistive, piezoelectric, capacitive, and optical), this section centers on piezoelectric technologies.

Piezoelectric Transduction

Sensors based on piezoelectric transduction [29] employ piezoelectric materials that exhibit a relationship between mechanical stress/strain and electrical voltage/charge. For shear stress sensing, the piezoelectric material is typically coupled to a floating element to transduce floating element displacement into deformation within the piezoelectric material. This deformation is either in the shear mode, as with Goyne et al. [30]–[32] and Williams et al. [33], or in the tensile/compressive mode, through use of a bimorph beam below the floating element, as with  Kim et al. [34]. Piezoelectric transduction offers the advantage of inherently low power operation; however, it cannot measure mean shear stress due to a low-frequency roll-off in sensitivity arising from inherent dielectric losses in the material. Further, inherent limitations in device sensitivity and noise floor generally limit application to either high shear stress levels or low bandwidths. Some piezoelectric based shear stress sensors are still in active development [33], [34]; however, no commercial devices currently exist.

ds-die-with-penny

Table of Contents

  1. Overview
  2. Comparing Techniques - Indirect Measurements
  3. Comparing Techniques - Direct Measurements
  4. Transduction Method - Piezoresistive
  5. Transduction Method - Piezoelectric
  6. Transduction Method - Capacitive
  7. Transduction Method - Optical
  8. Transduction Method - Summary and Guidelines***
  9. Sensor Construction - Conventional
  10. Sensor Construction - MEMS
  11. Summary and References

(*** indicates latest post in A Guide to Wall Shear Stress Measurement Blog Series)

References

[29]      W. G. Cady, “Piezoelectricity : an introduction to the theory and applications of electromechanical phenomena in crystals.” McGraw-Hill, 1946.

[30]      C. P. Goyne, A. Paull, and R. J. Stalker, “A Skin Friction Gauge for Impulsive Flows,” in 31st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 1995, p. AIAA 95-3152.

[31]      C. P. Goyne, R. J. Stalker, and A. Paull, “Transducer for Direct Measurement of Skin Friction in Hypervelocity Impulse Facilities,” AIAA J., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 42–49, Jan. 2002.

[32]      C. P. GOYNE, R. J. STALKER, and A. PAULL, “Skin-friction measurements in high-enthalpy hypersonic boundary layers,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 485, p. S0022112003003975, May 2003.

[33]      R. P. Williams, D. Kim, D. P. Gawalt, and N. A. Hall, “Surface Micromachined Differential Piezoelectric Shear-Stress Sensors.”

[34]      T. Kim et al., “Piezoelectric Floating Element Shear Stress Sensor for the Wind Tunnel Flow Measurement,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 64, no. 9, 2017.

IC2's DirectShear™ Sensing Systems 

Topics: Press Release, Wind Tunnel, Skin Friction, Shear Stress, DirectShear, Flight Testing, Guides

Subscribe Here!

About IC2

IC2  builds on two decades of research and rigorous testing to deliver scientific-grade precision sensors that push the envelope of aerospace measurement accuracy and performance. IC2’s precision sensors and instrumentation are designed from the ground up to meet the challenging environments of the aerospace industry.

From wind tunnels and other ground test facilities to flight test platforms, IC2 delivers scientific-grade measurement tools that provide unprecedented performance, including:

  1. Higher bandwidth and dynamic range
  2. Greater accuracy and precision
  3. Higher spatial resolution
  4. Ability to operate in environments considered too extreme for most sensors 

Contact us now to get more information about our services and products, place an order or to discuss how we can customize any of our products to meet your particular needs.